Renting out of VAT-exempt exhibition premises

PwC-skatteradgivning-House-2-solid_0002_burgundy.png ‹ Back to the articles

Renting out of VAT-exempt exhibition premisesThe Administrative Court of Appeal believes that a property owner who is a sub-supplier to an exhibition arranger does not provide VAT liable exhibition services but, rather provides VAT exempt renting out of premises, and the Court denied the exhibition arranger deduction of input VAT.

Background

Mässkonsult AB, the Company, arranges exhibitions and sells specially combined exhibition services to exhibitors. In conjunction with an exhibition, the Company purchased services from Stockholmsmässan in the form of premises and associated basic security services, access to cloakrooms, cleaning services, heating, lighting, staffing of the information desk and security and fire protection inspection services. In addition, the Company also purchased supplementary services such as technical services, rental of furniture, carpets, etc. Stockholmsmässan invoiced these services in one package as exhibition services with 25 percent VAT.

The Swedish Tax Agency denied deduction of input VAT on that portion referring to the renting of premises, including associated services, and levied a tax surcharge. The Agency determined that the provision of premises was to be considered to comprise a VAT exempt provision of premises and not the provisoin of an exhibition service, as this did not pertain to a provision of services to the exhibitors, themselves. However, the VAT on the supplementary services was correctly debited and the Company was granted deduction of input VAT on these services.

Decision by the Administrative Court of Appeal

The Administrative Court of Appeal in Stockholm believes, as a first stage in the assessment, that the agreement in concern argues for the interpretation that this is two separate types of provision of services – provision of the premises including associated services and provision of the specially ordered supplementary services. These parts do not have a very close relationship and so it would not be strange to separate them.

The subsequent stage was to test the nature of the provision of services referring to the premises including associated services. The Court is of the opinion that the associated services are necessary if the Company is to be able to use the exhibition premises in the manner intended and that they, due to this reason, are to be seen to be subordinate to the actual premises. The provision of these servcies comprises, therefore, a VAT exempt provision of premises. The Court confirms the Tax Agency’s decision regarding denied deduction of input VAT and the tax surcharge.

Comments

The Administrative Court of Appeal’s decision implies that sub-suppliers’ provision of premises, etc. to an arranger of an exhibition on the basis of the actual conditions involved in the case, cannot, in its entirety, be considered to comprise a VAT-liable exhibition service. This decision impacts not only the purchaser of the services through denied right of deduction but also leads to the seller/property owner incurring limited right of deduction of input VAT on its purchases, such as investments in the premises.

The Administrative Court points out that the actual content of the parties’ agreement has major importance in assessing the taxation issue. The question is if the outcome would have been different if all of the services had been included as standard services. Feel free to contact us for a discussion on this matter.

Do you have any questions on Value Added Taxes, customs and excise duties?

Lena Josefsson

Lena Josefsson

Lena Josefsson arbetar med momsfrågor för företag, organisationer och kommuner på PwC:s kontor i Göteborg. Lena har mångårig erfarenhet av momsområdet, bland annat som rättslig specialist på Skatteverket, föreläsare och skribent.
010-212 90 66
Lena Josefsson works with VAT-related issues for companies, organisations and municipalities at PwC’s office in Gothenburg. Lena has years of experience of VAT, having worked as a legal specialist at the Swedish Tax Agency, a lecturer and a writer.
+46 10 212 90 66

Leave a comment

Related articles

Read the article

Extended scope for tax deferral treatment in China

We have previously written an article with an overview of the different proposals for the purpose of improving the business climate for ...

Read the article
Read the article

Mikael Carlén wishes you Happy Holidays!

2018 has been an exiting year, with the election in Sweden and Brexit being subjects of much discussion. As regards tax proposals, there ...

Read the article
Read the article

New position – contracting of medical care personnel will be liable to VAT

As previously reported in Tax matters, the Supreme Administrative Court has announced a judgment (HFD 2018 ref. 41) implying that VAT is to ...

Read the article