<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=959086704153666&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

The Tax Agency continues to be restrictive in issuing certificates of residence to Swedish funds

‹ Back to the articles

PwC-skatteradgivning-Pen+Paper-solid_0001_maroon.pngAs we have previously written about in Tax matters, the Supreme Administrative Court on 15 April 2016 ruled that a Swedish securities fund has the right to a certificate of residence in applying the double taxation treaty between Sweden and Spain. The Tax Agency has published comments to this legal case and has announced a more restrictive interpretation than was generally expected.

The Tax Agency’s understanding is that the decision implies that a party’s intention when entering into a tax treaty, which is seen in amongst other things the statements in the preparatory work, is to be considered in interpreting the treaty. If it is seen in the preparatory work that the treaty is not to apply to persons incurring only a formal liability for taxes, then the Tax Agency cannot issue a certificate of residence.

Furthermore, the Tax Agency states that when it comes to tax treaties concluded after the funds were made exempt from taxation in Sweden (that is from and including 2012), such tax treaties have previously not applied to these funds. Consequently, as regards these agreements, the presumption is that the funds are not covered by the tax treaty unless stipulated otherwise in the treaty or unless indicated by general statements from either both or one of the parties to the treaty.

The above approach is, according to the Tax Agency, to apply to both securities funds (UCITS funds) and special funds.

Comments

The Tax Agency’s interpretation of the Supreme Administrative Court’s decision regarding Swedish funds means that the uncertainty whether Swedish funds have access to tax treaties remains in relation to a number of countries. In its comments, the Tax Agency does not provide any list of which tax treaties that entitle or do not entitle to residence certificate. However, it is said that the Tax Agency will update its previously policy statements in this area, that is as originally found in “Swedish investment funds and tax agreements” (Reg. No. 131125271-12/111) of 24 April 2012 and ”Taxation of dividends from Swedish investment fund to recipient who, based on the tax treaty, has residence in another country” (Reg. No. 131606012-13/111) of 4 October 2013. These updates may include further guidance on the Tax Agency’s position regarding this matter.

Stefan Carlsson and Daniel Glückman

Do you have any questions on corporate taxation?

Daniel Glückman

Daniel Glückman

Daniel Glückman arbetar på PwC i Stockholm med nationell och internationell företagsbeskattning och med specialisering inom den finansiella sektorn.

Kontakt: 010-212 91 77, daniel.gluckman@pwc.com

Leave a comment

Related articles

Read the article

Amount B – Navigating the Uncertainty Before Implementation

Amount B was first introduced in October 2020 but it wasn’t until December 2022 that a discussion draft was released for a public ...

Read the article
Read the article

How Tax Transparency and Sustainability go hand in hand

In an era of increasing transparency and sustainability requirements, tax transparency is more important than ever. This article shares the ...

Read the article
Read the article

Pillar II - Proposal to the Council on Legislation

Recently, a lot of attention has been given to the Pillar 2 administrative guideline published in June 2024 as the completion of the ...

Read the article