<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=959086704153666&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Swedish CFC regulations to be adapted to the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive

TM_mote-whiteboard ‹ Back to the articles

The Swedish Government proposes that the Swedish CFC regulations be adapted to the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive. Briefly speaking, this proposal implies major changes in the so-called whitelist, a reduction of the percentage threshold to qualify as an associated enterprise, and that royalty income will be subject to CFC taxation going forward. The new CFC regulations are proposed to come into effect on 1 January 2019.

Applicable CFC regulations

In brief, the proposed CFC regulations would imply that a shareholder in a foreign legal entity with low-taxed income can be taxed on an ongoing basis for its ownership portion of the income arising in that foreign legal entity. Taxation takes place regardless of whether the income is paid out by the entity to the shareholder or not. Income is not seen to be low-taxed if the foreign legal entity resides in a country listed in the appendix to Chapter 39a, IL (the whitelist) and if not covered by the exemptions included in that list. Furthermore, low-taxed income from a foreign legal entity residing within the EEA is exempt provided the entity conducts genuine economic activity.


The driving force behind the adaption of the Swedish CFC regulations to the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive is OECD’s BEPS project and the BEPS Action 3 recommendation for the design of more effective CFC regulations. The starting point in the entire BEPS project is to introduce regulations preventing the erosion of tax bases.

As a result, the Swedish Government has reviewed the CFC regulations to determine if Swedish law needs to be adapted to ensure compliance with the Directive. Below is a brief description of the Government’s proposal.

Shareholders in CFC-companies (ownership threshold)

According to the Directive, a person is seen to be a shareholder in a CFC company if he or she:

  1. controls at least 50 percent of the capital or of the votes in a given tax subject or
  2. has the right to receive more than 50 percent of the tax subject’s profits. However, countries can apply a lower level of control in order to ensure a higher level of protection.

When we look at the Swedish ownership threshold requirements, a taxable entity is seen to be a shareholder in a CFC company if that entity holds or controls participations or votes of at least 25 percent.

The Government deems that the Swedish rule with a lower requirement of level of control is in agreement with the Directive even if the situation in 2) above is not covered by the Swedish rules.

Definition of associated enterprise– an expanded scope

According to the Directive, a related party is an entity or natural person holding or controlling at least 25 percent (directly or indirectly) of another entity or who has the right to receive 25 percent of the profits.

According to the Income Tax Act (ITA), persons are considered related if the persons are parent companies and subsidiaries or if they are, primarily, under common control, or in case of holding or control of at least 50 percent of the capital or votes in the other entity (applies to both legal entities and natural persons).

The Government proposes that the threshold is reduced to 25 percent to meet the Directive’s requirements.

In order to ensure that the term common control corresponds to the concept related party, a supplement is suggested under which that two persons are related if they are both legal persons, and an individual or legal person, directly or indirectly holds or controls at least 25 percent of the capital or votes in the persons.

Appendix 39a to ITA exemptions for low-taxed income

According to the regulations in place, low-taxed income is exempt from CFC taxation if the foreign legal entity resides in one of the countries listed in appendix 39a of the ITA (and is not covered by any exemption in mentioned appendix).

Major changes are proposed. Appendix 39a, is to be updated so that countries with a tax system which cannot automatically been seen acceptable from a CFC perspective are entirely exempt from the list (that is, countries who, in principle, have no corporate tax or levy a very low corporate tax). Furthermore, many countries on the whitelist will be covered only partially (also applies to EEA companies) (this refers to countries with regular corporate tax systems incorporating a component of beneficial fiscal rules for financial operations, or who have a low corporate tax rate).

Countries, such Malta, will be exempt as it is deemed that Malta has no acceptable tax system from a CFC perspective. This implies that a shareholder in a foreign legal entity on Malta with low-taxed income which today is exempt from CFC taxation, in the future, will be subject to taxation for their portion of the income arising in the Maltese entity.

As noted in the comments to the previous version of the law proposal, all EU/EEA countries, except for the Nordic countries and Germany, have entirely, or partially, tax rules which may trigger Swedish CFC taxation.

Adaption of tax exempt types of income

The exemptions from the supplementary rule (i.e. for certain types of income not qualifying for tax exemption) applying to income from banks and financing operations, other financial operations and insurance operations is expanded to cover royalty and other income from intellectual property.

Elimination of double taxation upon subsequent disposal of CFC companies

A new regulation will be introduced which exempts capital gains on the disposal of participations in a CFC company to the extent the company has already previously been subject to CFC taxation.


The proposed adaptions would primarily imply that the classification of persons who can be subject to CFC taxation is expanded and that low-taxed income which today is exempt from CFC taxation can be subject to CFC taxation in the future.

As the regulations are strengthened, it is likely that CFC taxation would be triggered in more scenarios than is currently the case.

Do you have any questions on corporate taxation?

Anna Berglund

Anna Berglund

Anna Berglund arbetar med nationell och internationell företagsbeskattning på PwC i Stockholm.

Kontakt: 010-212 49 15

Leave a comment

Related articles

Read the article

Pillar II - draft bill submitted to the Legal Council

OECD and G20 have been working on a project within the Inclusive Framework regarding a global minimum tax (Pillar II) for a number of ...

Read the article
Read the article

Update of OECD Guidelines for Responsible Business Conduct

The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct are a set of recommendations directed at multinational ...

Read the article
Read the article

Will Transfer Pricing Rules be harmonized in Europe?

Over the last couple of years, compliance with Transfer Pricing rules has become increasingly more complex. This issue has been pointed out ...

Read the article